What Is It About Philosophy That's Eliciting Positive Feedback From Philosophers?

The book is primarily an intellectual history, yet to some extent, i am polemical in pushing back again, post modernism. It's like all of biology, it seems to me, sneaks back into the post modern project as soon as those initial extra linguistic realities are allowed. The pushback that i am getting on kant, or on nitu or hydeger, or whatever, t will be from those who are in a different school of interpretation with respect to them. But typically among the sopher, it's a respectful engagement,. because they recognize that there is a very good argument that can be made for interpreting the philosopher the other way.