2min chapter

Open to Debate cover image

Should SCOTUS Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution?

Open to Debate

CHAPTER

Should the Supreme Court Focus on the Original Meaning of the Constitution Right After This?

Randy Cevallos: The rule of law requires a commitment to originalism. He says non-originalist judges are not changing the meaning of the Constitution, they are simply recognizing that the open-ended original meaning can produce different results as the world changes. "Can we just cast aside 150 years of precedent and legal progress and racial justice? I think that would be ludicrous"

00:00

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode