sequoia is now staying on the board of those companies and so they actually have the most insight into it because they backed it when it was two people And then they're still on the board. If you ask him under oath why they did it i'll tell you it was for themselves I will people have the choice i bet you a million dollars for charity Whatever you want to do i bet you if you put him under oath and you subpoena him and you ask him why he did it He'll say he did it for himself and that's fine. All i'm saying is that's the kind of complexity that saks is talking about that does not add to success It is over complexifying