The Maw on Practice, by Elaborating Theory With a Capital T

The reason why i read the maw on practice is that, you know, altise puts this high price on theory with a capital t. And it's setting up this tribunal whereby philosophy is able to be the ultimate guaranter of the truth of sort of the raw material of historical facts. What gives philosophy the right? It seems kind of paradoxical. Thereis a way though, that that out to say, kind of, by elaborating theory with aCapital he's kind of redoing the thing that marksis, isais fighting against and setting up philosophy as the arbarbiter of historical materialism.