Is Film Really the Only Way That You Can Encountr?

Film is the only way to encounter this encounter, the real in tis wet re read it one more time. I'm not doubting that using that film isres impliable. Errot ino is not innocuous. He means in the liconian sense, as the object ot being an impossible object. That didn't happen before film. But then it's just a statement that what we encounter in film, i is impossible without the encounter of film.