Supreme Court, Presidential Immunity, and Political Urgency

The chapter critically examines the delay of conservative justices in addressing important matters and questions the concept of granting the president immunity. It expresses skepticism about institutional restraints on the president and the urgency of taking drastic political action to counter the current situation. The comparison of reactions to Katanji Brown Jackson and Clarence Thomas, as well as the potential protection of Trump from prosecution and the analysis of Michael Cohen's testimony, are key highlights of this chapter.