Is This an Argument for Theism or the Falsity of Naturalism?

Planegaonis: This is not an argument that naturalism is false. It's a very subtle difference, but a different claim. You can't expect an argument for doubting the reliability of your cognitive faculties if you believe in naturalism and the typical evolutionary story. And we could get into some objections to planigo's argument. Like michael bergman has a very interesting objection, where he thinks that our cognitive faculties are reliable in a basic way. Ah, so a. I mean, even even a naturalist could, could think that.