Is That Universal Accidental?

If we're going to have significant thought, bang, aeroslot, say, you got to be a realist about universals. Otherwise there's not one thing i'm saying. In lessers universal, i can equivocate with every utterancet. And therefore i'm not really making any sense. The words don't have an abiding meaning, so Therefore i'm not signifying anything. So what aristotle says is, no, it actually has to be essential, right? Because it's not essential. Riht, once again, it's variable, and it doesn't commit you to a univical utterance occasionally. Sos, when i figured out this,