An evolutionarily stable strategy is related to the same as the nath equilibrium for these ganes. There's a set of conditions that you can ask about pay offs that will tell you whether a certain strategy is evolutionarily stable. So things like, does it do better against itself than other things do against it? If so, it's going to be stable because other variants or mutans, are going to die off when they enter the pop cause they just won't do as well against this kind of dominant strategy that exists. Or if mutons do kind of equally well against the existing strategy, how do the mutins do against themselves versus the kind of dominant strategies? And so you
You can’t always get what you want, as a wise person once said. But we do try, even when someone else wants the same thing. Our lives as people, and the evolution of other animals over time, are shaped by competition for scarce resources of various kinds. Game theory provides a natural framework for understanding strategies and behaviors in these competitive settings, and thus provides a lens with which to analyze evolution and human behavior, up to and including why racial or gender groups are consistently discriminated against in society. Cailin O’Connor is the author or two recent books on these issues: Games in the Philosophy of Biology and The Origins of Unfairness: Social Categories and Cultural Evolution.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Cailin O’Connor received her Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of California, Irvine. She is currently Associate Professor of Logic and Philosophy of Science and a member of the Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Science at UCI. Her works involves questions in the philosophy of biology and behavioral science, game theory, agent-based modeling, social epistemology, decision theory, rational choice, and the spread of misinformation.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.