Sukeberg sent an internal memo to the entire company and then shared it. The argument that we deliberately push content that makes anguer for profit is deeply illogical. We make money from eds, and advertisers constantly tell us they don't want their eds next to harmful or angry content. There are many advertisers who don't care thei're c p g base. They just want to move product. And if they can get angry content or racy content at a lower price and bigger results, they'll go for it. So he's not telling the truth here. He's telling a truth and leaving out the overall big picture. I've spent a lot of time reflecting on