I'm Not Saying You Have to Be Convinced and Change Sides and Get a Hole in Your World.

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

This is not a religious resurrection ang this is elegy. Let's find out exactly who these people were, and let's have some current engineers and scientists look at the material because this would be an extraordinary claim. You can't use that analogy, as this is eric davis with material that he sawd and looked at coming in front of congress. And so can you stay open to the fact that perhaps its he's actually? I'm not saying you have to be convinced and change sides and get a hole in your world. But fitfor l keen is not a new york times journalist, just covering different stories, and this happens to be one other story.

In this episode, Michael Shermer speaks with explorer of consciousness and the emcee of Contact in the Desert (the largest UFO event in the country), Alan Steinfeld, who for over 30 years has hosted and produced the weekly television series New Realities in New York City. In his book, Making Contact, Steinfeld has edited together multiple perspectives on what he claims can no longer be denied: UFOs and their occupants are visiting our world. The volume contains original writings by the leading experts of the phenomena such as: the former head of the Harvard Medical school of psychiatry and an alien abduction investigator, Darryl Anka, internationally known for his communication with the extraterrestrial Bashar; Nick Pope, former UK Ministry of Defense UFO investigator; Grant Cameron, expert on American presidents and UFOs; Caroline Cory, director of Superhuman and ET: Contact; Mary Rodwell, author of The New Human about star-seed children, and many others.

Note: It is Dr. Shermer’s intention in his podcast to periodically talk to people with whom skeptics and scientists may disagree. In some episodes Dr. Shermer tries to “steel man” a position held by someone with differing views — that is, he says in his own words what he thinks the other person is arguing — but in this case the other person is in the conversation and can represent his own position clearly, which is what happens. As well, such conversations enable principles of skepticism to be employed in ways constructive to those who hold views not necessarily embraced by skeptics and scientists. Such principles should be embraced by all seekers of truth, and that is why we want to talk to people with whom we may disagree.