Debating Statutory Arguments and Presidential Immunity

The chapter delves into a detailed analysis of a Supreme Court case, focusing on Justice Barrett's viewpoint on statutory arguments and the complexities of statutory interpretation. There is a discussion on the majority's test regarding potential intrusion on the executive branch's authority, raising uncertainties and debates on immunity rulings and interlocutory appeals. Views on presidential immunity, dissenting opinions challenging it, and concerns about its impact on democracy and future presidents are thoroughly explored.