If the multiverse is true in our decisions, split the universe? Does that provide evidence that we are free? I don't think so. The fact that it was random and could have been otherwise doesn't say that I could have done otherwise. It says nothing at all about the what's special to a libertarian notion of free will. Whether the universe splits or not doesn't matter. And so even if it's like some quantum random quantum event that causes me to make decision that branches off the universe one way and or another way, if that's something that I'm not this is I'm a source and compatibilist maybe here.
Is character destiny, or can fluky decisions or tiny shifts in weather patterns fundamentally change who we are? Does the existence or non-existence of alternate universes have any bearing on freedom and responsibility? David and Tamler conclude their discussion of Ted Chiang’s “Anxiety is the Dizziness of Freedom” along with another very short piece by Chiang called “What’s Expected of Us” that was first published in Nature.
Plus, do you have low likability in the workplace? It could be because you’re too moral and therefore not that funny. But don’t worry, we have a solution that’ll help you increase your humor production and likability with no reduction in morality. All you have to do is listen!
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links:
- Richard Brody Reviews "Joker" | New Yorker
- Batman: The Killing Joke - Wikipedia
- Falling Down (1993) - IMDb
- People with high moral standards 'less likely' to be funny | The Independent
- Yam, K. C., Barnes, C. M., Leavitt, K., Uhlmann, E. L., & Wei, W. (2016). Why So Serious? Experimental and Field Evidence that Morality and a Sense of Humor are Psychologically Incompatible. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
- Aquino, K., & Reed, I. I. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of personality and social psychology, 83(6), 1423.
- Exhalation by Ted Chiang [amazon.com affiliate link]
- What's Expected of Us by Ted Chiang | Nature