If you look only at submissions and not acceptances what's the most common topic you see crossing the desk of the journal? At the moment I would say it's transgender issues because there's so few outlets where you can say your mind. Do you ever reject good or potentially good pieces just because they're not controversial enough? We tell our reviewers that and occasionally they write back and say yeah this is a reasonable article but I don't see why it couldn't get published in any other journal so we don't publish it then.
Peter Singer is one of the world’s most influential living philosophers, whose ideas have motivated millions of people to change how they eat, how they give, and how they interact with each other and the natural world.
Peter joined Tyler to discuss whether utilitarianism is only tractable at the margin, how Peter thinks about the meat-eater problem, why he might side with aliens over humans, at what margins he would police nature, the utilitarian approach to secularism and abortion, what he’s learned producing the Journal of Controversial Ideas, what he’d change about the current Effective Altruism movement, where Derek Parfit went wrong, to what extent we should respect the wishes of the dead, why professional philosophy is so boring, his advice on how to enjoy our lives, what he’ll be doing after retiring from teaching, and more.
Read a full transcript enhanced with helpful links, or watch the full video.
Recorded May 25th, 2023
Other ways to connect
Photo credit: Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek