The Ontico Ontology of Being

Heidiger thinks there's a whole ontology that we have never uncovered, hidden behind this everydayness. When we try to conceptualize and turn them into objects of knowledge, we miss out on all this other stuff. So the selection process is not like moving my standpoint around - i'm seeing a different part of the book than i've seen before. But it's a matter of what aspects of the book am i going to focus on? That is, what interpretation is. What are these divisions of being that make beings possible? And what is it?