The Flexibility of Negative Concepts

I think the argument's actually flexible to be translated in terms of lacks. You could say instead it just doesn't possess a positive. So yeah, I mean, the counter example basically just requires that there are concepts and we can analyze them noministically as concrete parts of the brain. They could be abstract things. We could think about it in a Aristotelian way where they're abstract, but they’re also instantiated or we could even just think aboutIt in a platonic way. Yeah. Good question. Thank you.