Argumenting to Zero Versus Arguing to a Hundred

i think what a lot of people that do argue for more fossil fuels and against all the stupid climate policies or whatever a, they end off stock ing the arguing to zero. So can you explain thet sure woud say, but it's notable. There aren't many people who argue for more falsefiels. Usually what they do as they argue against policies to restrict s fuels. Even there thereis a defensive version. And so you can argue to 100. The other side has to argue to zero.