What Makes a Good Summarization?

Linguistic knowledge merely comes nd. Well, your paper that caught my attention is titled, what makes a good summary? Reconsidering the focus of automatic summarization. Yet, it wasn't really that long ago when people still seriously considered that we could solve negation with just a couple of handcrafted rules. Like there's more to that, right? I think, in order to understand, like, what would work well, or why something doesn't work well, yet, linguistic knowledge merely comes Nd.