constructivist view of morality is more like the laws of speeding or the rules of playing basketball that are constructed and there's no such thing as the perfect rules for playing basketball but there's nevertheless what we make up. So I don't know what kind of constructivist you are whether you think that moral principles correct moral principles are ultimately founded in each individual's attitudes or whether it's a group effort. Do you want to say anything about that? You might say well Russ isn't that kind of arrogant? Yeah you know why are you Russ the arbiter of what's right and wrong?" "I very roughly think that there is a job for moral philosophy namely to take the moral intuitions that
Despite occasional and important disagreements, most people are in rough agreement about what it means to be moral, to do the right thing. There’s much less agreement about why we should be moral, or even what kind of answer to that question could be convincing. Philosopher Russ Shafer-Landau is one of the leading proponents of moral realism — the view that objective moral truths exist independently of human choices. That’s not my own view, but ethics and meta-ethics are areas in which I think it’s wise to keep an open mind and listen to smart people who disagree. This conversation offers food for thought for people on either side of this debate.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Russ Shafer-Landau received his Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Arizona. He is currently Professor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Among his numerous books are Moral Realism: A Defense and Whatever Happened to Good and Evil? He is the editor of Oxford Studies in Metaethics, and is the founder and organizer of the annual Madison Metaethics Workshop.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.