Exploration vs Exploration

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

There's a number of different variables that sort of influence any given situation, whether you should be doing more exploration versus exploitation. In an environment where there's like an occasional choice that just kills you or has really, really bad outcomes, then exploration has a significant cost. Whereas in a safe environment where you can explore without incurring a significant chance of something really bad happen, then exploration is less costly. And I think a third factor just has to do with how much upside you think there is in that domain,.

Read the full transcript here.

Why should we not optimize some things in life? Should some things (e.g., interpersonal relationships) be "off-limits" for optimization? How much time spent being unproductive is good for us? What can we learn by paying attention to our moods? Does science make progress and produce knowledge too slowly? Why is research methodology applied so inconsistently, especially in the social sciences?

Christie Aschwanden is author of Good to Go: What the Athlete in All of Us Can Learn From the Strange Science of Recovery, and co-host of Emerging Form, a podcast about the creative process. She's the former lead science writer at FiveThirtyEight and was previously a health columnist for The Washington Post. Her work has appeared in dozens of publications, including Wired, Scientific American, Slate, Smithsonian, Popular Science, New Scientist, Discover, Science, and NPR.org. She is a frequent contributor to The New York Times. She was a National Magazine Award finalist in 2011 and has received journalism fellowships from the Pulitzer Center for Crisis Reporting, the Carter Center, the Santa Fe Institute, and the Greater Good Science Center. Learn more about her at christieaschwanden.com or follow her on Instagram at @cragcrest or on Mastodon at @cragscrest.

Staff