Proposed changes would see a single fee, but they are two feets. One is called base fee, which is burned, and then there's a tip that goes to the minors. A target block size of ten million gas for now, and a mex block size that is twice this amount. The result is that e blocks can be up to 20 million gas. But at the same time, the security of your theorem is even weakened when you basically prevent specialization of minding.
In this episode, Su and Hasu talk about blockspace market mechanisms and EIP-1559. Read Hasu's analysis of EIP-1559 (w/ Georgios Konstantopoulos)
Topics covered:
- what EIP-1559 is and the problems it solves
- negative-sum vs zero-sum vs positive-sum proposals
- reasons against EIP-1559
- what, if anything, can Bitcoin learn from EIP-1559
- impact on long-term security
- how realistic perpetual issuance is in Bitcoin
- elastic blocksize proposals in Bitcoin
- lessons from the scaling debate
- how parasitic L2s can threaten baselayer security
- how dApps benefit from EIP-1559
- building dApps on appchains vs Ethereum
- why every chain incl. Ethereum specializes over time
- first-price auction vs fixed-price sale
- EIP-1559 as an oracle for on-chain congestion
- moving the Overton window for changes to Bitcoin
Su Zhu is the CEO and CIO of Three Arrows Capital.
Hasu is a cryptocurrency researcher and writer.
Together, they publish on Deribit Insights and uncommoncore.co.