The Problem With Logical Positivism

LZ Granderson: Just because you can't prove something demonstrably doesn't mean you can't rationally weigh the various belief systems to figure out whether or not one is more likely true than another. LZ: I've been trying to steer you between two poles. On one end is what has been called logical positivism, or at least it used to be, call that. And on the other end is what you might call perspectivalism. He says there's no such thing as a view from nowhere and therefore nobody's really totally objective. lz: Is there any way then we can know which of these belief systems is more likely to be true?Is there any way