Is Section 230 a Good Idea?

At times it did seem in the argument like the justices were so unsatisfied with the different ATA theories in front of them that they just like kind of wanted to go back to section 230. You could hear the justices frustration with the proposed limits on ATA liability in other questioning from Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan. I really have no idea what the court is going to do on the anti terrorism act. Part of me thinks that they should do what's called dig the cases at this point. So a dig just means dismissing the case as and provinately granted, which would mean the court would say we shouldn't have even considered this case.