I think the most pessimistic reading of what he's saying is our society is set up in really deep ways to make us desperate for social connection and meaning and purpose. So I like what he says about you know television both is a problem because now the more you watch television the more you withdraw from society. And so it both is like a cause of your problems and offers itself as a solution. Yeah so it's cyclical maybe but I think cyclical and maybe maybe it's an upward spot. Maybe maybe it't an upward spiral.
We dive into David Foster Wallace’s sprawling 1993 essay “E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction.” How do TV and new forms of media keep their hold on us when we know at some level that they’re reinforcing our loneliness and passivity? That’s easy, Wallace says, post-modern cool. Flatter me, let me think we’re all in the joke together, give me “an ironic permission-slip to do what I do best whenever I feel confused and guilty: assume, inside, a sort of fetal position, a pose of passive reception to comfort, escape, reassurance.” But in the years since this essay, the TV landscape has completely transformed. Has it transcended its function as a surrogate companion for lonely people, or has it just found new ways to keep us isolated and passive?
Plus, we talk about the recent new SPSP guidelines and Jon Haidt’s recent essay on why he’s resigning from the organization. (Sorry, Jon!)
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: