The Differences Between Rortes and Rorte on Ethics

Rorte opposes the private domain as he calls it embedded in philosophers like the rida high dagger who have these private fantasies and then the boring habermascians. For Kant precisely when you subtract from your community and just talk in the free space of reason with others individuals this is the public use of reason. The paradox again for Kant is that state is a private institution but universities should be public exempted from state so this universal dimension is missing for me in rorte. i'm totally pro universality how should i put it i believe in universality i think that one of the greatest ontological errors as it were undermine sustaining this liberal multiculturalist ideology it's precisely this distrust