Is the Form of Free Willing Universal in the Same Way as a Scientific Law?

S Kan is an empirical determinist when it comes to the empirical realm. He thinks that if you are acting simply within that realm, then you're not acting autonomously. You're just subject to the determinations of external causes. So how do we reconcile that? Well, he uses his epistemology in saying, well, we must be free in the numinal realm, in the land beyond experience. It's a practical necessity. We have to think of ourselves as free. And it's not right sometimes and wrong other times, correct. That's whyi does the uni ality and ecess yes. But its sounded pretty good, you sheep.