I think he just wants people to be honest about why if they're punishing somebody, be honest about what it is that's going on here. So i don't think he would be against resentment or, i mean, he has other problems with resentment. I think he thinks it's something he should mostly transcend. But i think he feels like the reactive s are ok, and punishment, under circumstances is, is ok. Don't trick yourself into thinking that this is some sort of justice, like absolute justice, that's being doneyeiw. That last sentence is, alas, a great line, a lot of great lines. Like i get why the intro talks about music so much
Socrates was ugly and tired of life, so he made a tyrant of reason. Philosophers are mummies who hate the body and the senses. Reason is a tricky old woman. Morality is a misunderstanding. Kant is a sneaky Christian. And don't even get Nietzsche started on "free will" or the "self" - just excuse for priests to punish people, a hangman's metaphysics. David and Tamler dive into Friedrich Nietzsche's Twilight of the Idols, a fascinating set of aphorisms brimming with passion, provocation, questions without answers.
Plus, a professor is sanctioned for sex talk with his students - fair or coddling foul?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: