This is where the ter s of this debate and what's at stake are confusing to me. I think sometimes it seems like people are just saying, look, we do have in ordinary language when we talk amongst each other,. When we call things evil, we mean something that is different than just really, really, really fucking bad. And then there's other people who might think it's actually morally wrong for us to not have this separate category.
David and Tamler descend into the dark pits of Hell to look Satan in the eyes and discover the nature of evil. OK…that’s not fully accurate, we just read and talk about a couple of philosophy articles that analyze the concept. What are the features of evil people and acts? Does evil just mean ‘really really really really bad’ or is it categorically different in some way? Can you be evil without ever actually causing harm? Is Tony Soprano evil?
Plus we take a "moral alignment" quiz (inspired by role playing games like Dungeons and Dragons). We both want to end up as ‘chaotic good’ but does it turn out that way? And what kind of character is a unicorn?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: