I'd like to hear what you have to say about that. I tey tet takes om o pestious and thought and remember what the motion is proper do. Mister greenstock, mister cushner, bernard, policim was the policy of most western governments up to nine 11. It failed miserably. A well, wel we haven't discussed the actual reason that arcada gave for attacking, which was the presence of us. Troops in the holeand insid arabia. And in order to respond to being attacked by that, they could either leave, as they did from lebanon in 19 86, fearing more terror, or they could have stayed.
Have the West’s efforts to eradicate Al-Qaeda around the world simply been fuelling the flames of hatred and violence? Or would we have suffered even more atrocities if we’d left the militants to plot in their hiding places? Is the US right to be pursuing its hard line against militants in countries such as Pakistan and Yemen? These are just some of the questions explored in this Intelligence Squared debate from September 2011, which saw former President of Pakistan Pervez Musharraf and former US Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Public Diplomacy Colleen Graffy defend the motion. Opposing the motion were former French foreign minister and co-founder of Médecins Sans Frontières Bernard Kouchner and former UK Permanent Representative at the United Nations in New York Sir Jeremy Greenstock. The debate was chaired by BBC World News presenter Zeinab Badawi.
Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/intelligencesquared.
See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices