What's the Top Line in an Emergency Docket?

This was straight up conventional, status quo administrative law. For the ocea mandate to be enforcable, you would have to grant ocea more discretion than a fair reading of the statute in line with current administrative law jurisprudence permits. And for c m s, what you had was classic normal agency deference. So this was like a status quo. Both of them were status quo pinions, which makes some sense in an emergency docket context. Cause, is the court goingo are the institutionalists in particular, and the court will want to move the ball substantially one way or the other on administrative law in an emergencyDocket case? I don't