i think he wanted it to be an argument, and not someth actly. People thayt actually like affected people's lives r dramatic way. And i also like his attitude when they talk about it. Towards the end, he asks bostrum if it excites him the idea that we might be. But then he says, it makes it quite compellin he's trying to think of something like, good to say about it. It makes it quite compelling that there are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in our philosophy.
David and Tamler explore the many variations of simulation theory, the view that our universe is just a computer generated model created by an advanced civilization that has reached “technological maturity.” What does the growing popularity of simulation theories reveal about contemporary life? Are any of the arguments for simulation theory compelling or are they just post-hoc ways of justifying what you already believe on faith? If we are living in a simulation, does that mean we can go around killing people? Would it change anything about how we should live? Rodney Ascher’s (Room 237, The Nightmare) excellent documentary "A Glitch in the Matrix" gets the discussion going.
Plus the return of the VBW does conceptual analysis segment - a careful, rigorous, systematic inquiry into the concept “cringe.”*
*Note: if you think the opening segment is itself cringe, that’s because we’re doing seventh dimensional Zoomer meta shit and you just didn’t get it.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: