In biological populations, you can have an equivalent of that. You might have part of the population that behaves one way all the time and then another part that behaves another way, but all the time. And i'm wondering if there's a game theoretic explanation for well, so i don't think that would probably be best handled using a game. This, probably you'd want to use a model that was less game theoretical and more about utilizing, use resources. But, ye, it's not a sort of paradime case where you really want to go with this kind of theory. I don't think, if it's like the rest of science, i'm sure that the game theorists
You can’t always get what you want, as a wise person once said. But we do try, even when someone else wants the same thing. Our lives as people, and the evolution of other animals over time, are shaped by competition for scarce resources of various kinds. Game theory provides a natural framework for understanding strategies and behaviors in these competitive settings, and thus provides a lens with which to analyze evolution and human behavior, up to and including why racial or gender groups are consistently discriminated against in society. Cailin O’Connor is the author or two recent books on these issues: Games in the Philosophy of Biology and The Origins of Unfairness: Social Categories and Cultural Evolution.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Cailin O’Connor received her Ph.D. in Philosophy from the University of California, Irvine. She is currently Associate Professor of Logic and Philosophy of Science and a member of the Institute for Mathematical Behavioral Science at UCI. Her works involves questions in the philosophy of biology and behavioral science, game theory, agent-based modeling, social epistemology, decision theory, rational choice, and the spread of misinformation.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.