Dartmouth political science professor Brendan Nihan and his colleagues found that the backfire effect failed to replicate their study. They then asked people who had positive attitudes towards Trump and negative attitudes toward Clinton to read two incorrect statements made by Trump on the campaign trail. After reading the corrections, most of them changed their beliefs about what they thought was a crime epidemic in America. The results showed that people had quickly and without hesitation updated their opinions after being exposed to new information.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode