Debate Tactics and Misinformation

This chapter examines the tactics used by conservative figures in live debates, focusing on their strategy of presenting opinions as facts to dominate discussions. It critiques the oversimplification of complex issues like immigration and welfare, showcasing how misleading arguments can manipulate perceptions. Additionally, the chapter highlights the challenges of engaging in discourse on contentious topics, particularly through the lens of a debate between a student and Charlie Kirk regarding morality in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.