Nietzsche found that his takedowns for instance of Kant's notions of synthetic operari were actually on good grounds right like i thought that what he was making was like a point that Kant himself is being incoherent here. I don't understand why you can't express views even like convictions convictions that you stand behind 100 without also being committed to them being objectively true in some senselike that's what i i feel like this is the same argument we have when we're talking about William James and one of us has a blind spot here because i just  don't understand why these philosophers are are misguided they're making either logical errors or they're letting their desires overwhelm their reason but yes we