The UFOs Aren't All Balloons, or Are They All Just Radar Bounts?

5min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

There are too many claims for anybody to debank a and so what happens if you are a practice its of any kind, as you get tons of this stuff in your emal. You have to decide whether you're going to spend time figuring out what the claim is getting like, getting really up on it, and then bunking it,. Even though it's pretty hard to publish a negative result like this also did not prove s p sometimes hard to do. And that's how routinely, stuff about a e f o doesn't pass muster. I' Its the usual responses, why don't you just investigate it and prove i'm wrong? Well, that takes a lot of time and

Everyone has heard of the term “pseudoscience”, typically used to describe something that looks like science, but is somehow false, misleading, or unproven. Many would be able to agree on a list of things that fall under its umbrella — astrology, phrenology, UFOlogy, creationism, and eugenics might come to mind. But defining what makes these fields “pseudo” is a far more complex issue. Given the virulence of contemporary disputes over the denial of climate change and anti-vaccination movements — both of which display allegations of “pseudoscience” on all sides — there is a clear need to better understand issues of scientific demarcation. Shermer and Gordin explore the philosophical and historical attempts to address this problem of demarcation.