Rep. Goldman said that even with Twitter, there was no direct government censorship of lawful speech. The Weasel word in the whole sentence is "direct," which changes its meaning to make it seem as if they were trying to do just that. But once you've asked Twitter to do it, it's not direct. It's not direct, because Twitter's doing it. So what are you even talking about? All we did is put some kind of soft, continuous persuasive pressure on them by sending the FBI in to talk to them. I don't know any way to fix a system that's constitutional amendment probably, so impractical.
My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
- The tools of success vs. equity
- President Biden, lies or dementia?
- GPT4 with multimodal flavors
- CNN says Russia out of ammo
- Kash Patel on Ray Epps
- Is reporting on Fauci accurate?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support