Rep. Goldman said that even with Twitter, there was no direct government censorship of lawful speech. The Weasel word in the whole sentence is "direct," which changes its meaning to make it seem as if they were trying to do just that. But once you've asked Twitter to do it, it's not direct. It's not direct, because Twitter's doing it. So what are you even talking about? All we did is put some kind of soft, continuous persuasive pressure on them by sending the FBI in to talk to them. I don't know any way to fix a system that's constitutional amendment probably, so impractical.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode