Is the Subject Coinciding With the Objective?

Berklenism is about a relationship between our minds and something external. Can't just be of our minds to our minds, although it'll kind of turn out to be that way. But there must be some sense in which that there's a division into two. Otherwise it just doesn't even make sense to talk about knowledge. So when we talk about the subject coinciding with the objective, it's just my subjective. And an object is an object, and don't give it any stronger ontological status than that at this point. Or when i say mind ependent reality, the independence doesn't have to mean that it's outside the mind, right? In berklen