evolutionary psychologists and cognitive scientists are disagreeing over how the mind works. This paper is an attempt to offer a way out of this debate, says O'Neill. It argues that emotions can be revised in light of information from central process such as love or jealousy. So for me, the knowledge that your wife, jen is cheating on you is what caused your jealousy. If you were to chan li, believe cim out. And bwe, i don't understand your objection before we get to like, how the levels ofjelousis are different. We're trying to get on to the forbidden w teach oy to forbidden gosesson a guess spot re like a a
David and Tamler talk about the often rancorous debate among cognitive scientists and evolutionary psychologists over whether the mind is modular -- composed of discrete systems responsible for vision, reasoning, cheater detection, sexual jealousy, and so on. David and Tamler (mostly David) describe the history of the debate, then dive into a recent paper (Pietraszewski & Wertz, 2021) arguing that virtually all the disagreement is the product of a conceptual and methodological confusion – that the two sides are operating with different levels of analysis and talking past each other as a result.
Plus, we REALLY tried not to talk about the University of Austin thing for the whole opening segment. We had another topic lined up and everything. It just didn’t work out. Cicero would understand. Bari Weiss stans might wanna skip to the main segment.
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: