I think that the republican party is going to just pay such a massive price for this. It feels profoundly unfair to take a right away after 50 years. I understand what it means to be an originalist or a textualist. And i respect le's perspectives that the constitution should be interpreted verbatim. But do you do that at the sake of a lack of compassion or of ampathy for how the world works to day? Should we not have a point of view that says, irrespective of how we decide, we should factor in what the moral temperature of the country is in that moment in which something is decided?