The Consensus Within the Noise

There's always going to be a contrarian doctor, whether they be a medical doctor or a scientist. And that should be your barometer for whether the information you're seeing from the larger group is correct and the smaller group may be incorrect. A whistle blower will have evidence that holds up, whereas a conspiracy theorist or pseudo scientist will have evidence which crumbles under no further investigation. I mean, i guess that for me, is where what it really comes down to, is, what is the evidence that you are providing to support your claim?