If you go back far enough there were other things that were different For example the intensity of the Sun was different. So if you're going to use the past to make your argument I'd use the last 50 years, but I wouldn't use thousands of years ago. That's a bad argument Does anybody everybody agree? Because you can still be super skeptical on climate change, but don't use the historical You know middle the What do we use the dark ages and it's just ignore all that. Even 50 years ago frankly, you know Tony Heller is back on Twitter soEverybody remember Tony Heller? He's the most prolific Data skeptic about climate change now he goes after the data and he

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode