The End Is Not the End, It Continues

The vav, which you alluded to in the poem, is the marker of continuity. So then at the end of the poem, you changed end to end to say that the end is not the end, it continues. I thought that's a beautiful sort of tribute to the life of somebody who reached his end, but then was a testament tosort of the idea that you can keep reading. And so there's like actually no end because the end replaces it. It's a happy kind of cross linguistic pun or something like that. Right?