Mina is built around this concept of recursive snarks. Are those the same kinds of versions of what you had been working on, or did you see, like, people kind of working on this in parallel? Or is this really kind of like your work would have been te foundation for some of the stuff? E wha, sic. Definitions such as are, what is proof carring data, mostly remain the same. Even articulating what is the goal of what you get once you recurse the snark. It's actually not so simple. Once you see it, then then make sense. The techniques to achieve pro arin data have evolved, as should be the case

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode