We explore connections between FEP and enactivism, including tensions raised in a paper critiquing FEP from an enactivist perspective.
Dr. Maxwell Ramstead provides background on enactivism emerging from autopoiesis, with a focus on embodied cognition and rejecting information processing/computational views of mind.
Chris shares his journey from robotics into FEP, starting as a skeptic but becoming convinced it's the right framework. He notes there are both "high road" and "low road" versions, ranging from embodied to more radically anti-representational stances. He doesn't see a definitive fork between dynamical systems and information theory as the source of conflict. Rather, the notion of operational closure in enactivism seems to be the main sticking point.
The group explores definitional issues around structure/organization, boundaries, and operational closure. Maxwell argues the generative model in FEP captures organizational dependencies akin to operational closure. The Markov blanket formalism models structural interfaces.
We discuss the concept of goals in cognitive systems - Chris advocates an intentional stance perspective - using notions of goals/intentions if they help explain system dynamics. Goals emerge from beliefs about dynamical trajectories. Prof Friston provides an elegant explanation of how goal-directed behavior naturally falls out of the FEP mathematics in a particular "goldilocks" regime of system scale/dynamics. The conversation explores the idea that many systems simply act "as if" they have goals or models, without necessarily possessing explicit representations. This helps resolve tensions between enactivist and computational perspectives.
Throughout the dialogue, Maxwell presses philosophical points about the FEP abolishing what he perceives as false dichotomies in cognitive science such as internalism/externalism. He is critical of enactivists' commitment to bright line divides between subject areas.
Prof. Karl Friston - Inventor of the free energy principle https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=q_4u0aoAAAAJ
Prof. Chris Buckley - Professor of Neural Computation at Sussex University https://scholar.google.co.uk/citations?user=nWuZ0XcAAAAJ&hl=en
Dr. Maxwell Ramstead - Director of Research at VERSES https://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=ILpGOMkAAAAJ&hl=fr
We address critique in this paper:
Laying down a forking path: Tensions between enaction and the free energy principle (Ezequiel A. Di Paolo, Evan Thompson, Randall D. Beere)
https://philosophymindscience.org/index.php/phimisci/article/download/9187/8975
Other refs:
Multiscale integration: beyond internalism and externalism (Maxwell J D Ramstead)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33627890/
MLST panel: Dr. Tim Scarfe and Dr. Keith Duggar
TOC (auto generated):
0:00 - Introduction
0:41 - Defining enactivism and its variants
6:58 - The source of the conflict between dynamical systems and information theory
8:56 - Operational closure in enactivism
10:03 - Goals and intentions
12:35 - The link between dynamical systems and information theory
15:02 - Path integrals and non-equilibrium dynamics
18:38 - Operational closure defined
21:52 - Structure vs. organization in enactivism
24:24 - Markov blankets as interfaces
28:48 - Operational closure in FEP
30:28 - Structure and organization again
31:08 - Dynamics vs. information theory
33:55 - Goals and intentions emerge in the FEP mathematics
36:58 - The Good Regulator Theorem
49:30 - enactivism and its relation to ecological psychology
52:00 - Goals, intentions and beliefs
55:21 - Boundaries and meaning
58:55 - Enactivism's rejection of information theory
1:02:08 - Beliefs vs goals
1:05:06 - Ecological psychology and FEP
1:08:41 - The Good Regulator Theorem
1:18:38 - How goal-directed behavior emerges
1:23:13 - Ontological vs metaphysical boundaries
1:25:20 - Boundaries as maps
1:31:08 - Connections to the maximum entropy principle
1:33:45 - Relations to quantum and relational physics
