Hanania's Foreign Policy Is Incoherent

American foreign policy is incoherent, that it has no overarch goal. Even when we're clearly not hoping to benefit ourselves, our tactics are still incoherent. Sanctions almost never accomplish their intended goal and generally end up being humanitarian disasters. Is true grand strategy more common in a multi polar world, as the lone hyper power is the us? Trying to be all thingst people? Are monarchies and autocracies better at grand strategy because decision making power is more centralized?