Is There Any Such Thing as Uninterpreted Data?

There is no such thing as uninterpreted data right there's always a decision somewhere that something should be considered interesting enough to be counted as data. I mean even if we talk about something like goals and shots right you can't really argue it like with what a goal or a shot is but obviously the reason why people are counting these things in the first place is based on some kind of interpretational decisions. So again it's making sure that it's applied and and connecting and bridging that gap between the art and the science so that it's going to be useful otherwise you've got these tools that don't get used at all.