Do You Think It Might Have Been Your Fault Then?

The average score of the studies cited in the book is 14. It's a one to 100 scale. The number of them that have never been attempted to be replicated are brutal. But what's really interesting is that coniman himself actually replied to this thing. He says clearly, the experimental evidence the ideas i presented i were significantly weaker than i believed when i wrote it. This was simply an error. I am still attached to every study that i cited, and have not unbelieved them. And e connomons work scor 14 out of a hundred. So that's where the title of this art comes from. Do you not think it might have been your fault then?