Krannics and the Expected Value Case

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Roxanne Jones: It's interesting because if you make a kind of expected value case for Krannics and you say, well, even if there's only a one in a hundred chance of being revived, as long as you have enough money where it's not too big a burden for you to spend money on it. And I think for some people, then they start thinking, well, but like, if there's a one in 5,000 chance that I like live as a brand new vat for, you know, million years,. That actually affects the expected value case in a lot. She says she doesn't see cryonics making these scenarios much more likely to

Read the full transcript here.

What is cryonics? And how does it work? What do we know right now about reversing death? And what would we have to learn to make resurrection from a cryogenically frozen state feasible? How much does cryonics cost? What incentives would future people have for reviving a cryo-frozen person? How likely is it that a cryo-frozen person will be brought back in the future? Why do people (even pro-cryonics people) "cryoprastinate" and put off considering cryonics for a later time? What sorts of risks are involved in being frozen and later revived? What philosophical and ethical issues are at stake with cryonics? Would a revived person be able to integrate into a future society? Why is there stigma around cryonics in some cultures?

Max Marty is an entrepreneur and futurist who lived and worked in the Bay Area for 10 years. He's now in Austin and has been working to build the Cryonics community, including co-hosting the Cryonics Underground podcast and running the largest Cryonics discord community: The Cryosphere. He looks forward to getting back into startups in the future, this time in biotech.

Further reading:

Staff