The Problem With Hopper's Epistemology

In Hopper's view, all knowledge should come from falsifications and corroborations. So why do we need the concept of corroboration in Hopper's epistemology? Yes, am I convinced you enough that we can go on to admit a problem? This is, it's a difficult problem. Okay, I'm going to still argue that this whole point of view is still just wrong. Although I'm admitting that there's some truth to it. It's got some various militude. Scientists continually prove again and again that they are better at Hopper'sEpistemology than any paparians I've ever met.